San Francisco, CA – When you look around at the governing world structures as well as the successful global political, cultural and economic institutions created by the white race, there can be no mistaking the overarching dominance and success of this branch of humanity, over and above all other branches.
However, the political correctness movement which took hold after the ravages of World War 2 threatened to destroy the modern world have made it such that studies and research into the area of racial distinctions have been greatly suppressed or sanitized to such an extent that little research value can be derived from any such research.
That trend is fortunately changing. Call it the “Trump” effect if you will but since the inauguration of Donald Trump as President of the United States, more researchers are coming forward with both physiological as well as environmental explanations for the success and superiority of the white race over its counterparts under the umbrella of humanity.
With the latest research in the United Kingdom and the discovery of fossils in Southern Europe now confirming and debunking the earlier belief that Africa was the cradle of humanity, researchers are now trying to understand why the white race was able to conquer so many foreign lands as well as achieve such great strides in commerce, science and politics.
Anthropologists at the Leibniz Universität Hannover in Hannover, Germany suggest that the success of the white race, derived mainly from Europeans may be due in large part to a blessing of geography. Unlike the tropical belt which runs around the earth, where temperatures stay within relative fixed bands throughout the year, early humans living in the temperate latitudes would have had to contend with extremes in temperature as a way of life. According to Dr. Frederik Freisburg, a geographical and environmental anthropologist,
“If we worry about climate change today, the early Europeans, with very little technology would have had to contend with extreme climate change once every three months. Imagine that.”
Freisburg suggests that it was this ability of the early European race that gave them the edge in terms of mental development.
“They would have had to have anticipated the coming seasons, learned about pooling resources, working together and storing whatever they had. From the onset, they would have had to quickly move from being hunters to hunter-gatherers, the cornerstone for the founding of the modern European civilization.”
The constant change in seasons would also have made the early white race far more adaptable than their black African counterparts. Whereas the blacks would have been able to depend on the regularity of their crops as certain as the rising of the sun, the early white race would have had far more variables to contend with and a stronger instinct to survive. Friesburg controversially suggests this may also be why to this day blacks may suffer from “entitlement paralysis” and are consequently unable to improve their situation independently,
“When the earth gives you everything that you need without you having to put much work into it, that part of your brain which asks you to seek more, to store, to acquire or to develop – that part of your mental development becomes stunted or lost.”
While Friesiburg’s findings are controversial, they would go in some way to explaining why even today, decades after the end of colonialism in Africa, blacks in Africa are still unable to effectively govern their continent nor provide it with the basic food and property security needed for it to prosper. This despite the African continent being blessed with every conceivable natural resource required for the functioning of a modern civilized society.
Dr. James Argyle, a geneticist from University College London’s Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, argues that the early European race was not only blessed with this need for adaptation, that adaptability gene also led to the development of what he terms “intra-diversity.” Which is where the racial group itself has sufficient enough variance within itself to develop the necessary diversity to thrive. In a study of all the major races represented in the world today, Argyle noted that only the white Caucasian race, descended principally from Europe demonstrates “intra-racial variance.”
“If we look at the Chinese and East Asians, there is a great degree of homogeneity within the Mongoloid race, same for the blacks, the Hispanics.”
“But if we examine the white race, even within the race there are variations. Only whites have different colored hair, different eye colors, no other race on the planet possesses those distinct genetic traits.”
Argyle suggests that the environmental variation when combined with the intra-racial variance helped to create a superior race of humans, we now recognize today as being white and explains why despite never having invented things like gunpowder, which was invented by the Chinese, it was white people who saw its potential to be used as a means of power and control. Argyle adds,
“Whites didn’t just see things as they were, they saw things as what they could be and I think that is the biggest difference when you compare between the races.”
It is this genetic advantage which explains why the white race has prevailed to this very day in every aspect and every area of global life. Whites invented the internet, put men on the moon and reached for the stars.
The findings while controversial were not intended to put down or subjugate other races such as the blacks, but rather to begin an honest questioning process about whether leaving the blacks to their own devices, to govern and to “sort out their own problems” is really the most humane option that the white race can adopt for other races.
The Chinese are taking a different approach. China’s rapid development demonstrates how a race with a superior genetic ancestry melded with favorable climatic conditions can restart and reignite the glory days of Chinese civilization, unlocking decades of potential which had been hidden away by the dregs of communism. The Chinese have been big investors in Africa, undertaking and embarking on huge infrastructure projects in the hopes of developing the continent. However, unlike the aid and assistance models of many liberal Western democracies, the Chinese have no delusions of the kind of people they are dealing with. According to Lee Shaoxing, an investment director for a Chinese sovereign wealth fund, who invests actively in Africa on behalf of the Chinese government,
“You cannot treat the Africans (blacks) as equal partners. They are not. The only thing they bring is what they are already sitting on.”
“It is when you treat them as equal partners that you can expect to run into problems.”
The vast majority of Western aid and development packages have failed in Africa primarily because of the liberal hang up to allow the aid recipient to administer their own aid packages. According to a former United Nations (U.N.) envoy and aid worker, who declined to be identified, citing certain gag orders after leaving the U.N.,
“We have seen billions of dollars of aid pour into Africa wasted because we left it to the Africans to manage the aid and development packages themselves.”
“The aid has inevitably fallen into the hands of warlords and corrupt governments and I would say that based on my experience, no more than 5 percent makes it to its intended recipients.”
The Chinese on the other hand have had relative success in their aid and development programs in Africa and they have no qualms about recognizing the distinct differences in the state of development of the blacks. At a recent exhibition in the Chinese capital of Beijing for top Chinese investors looking for investment opportunities in Africa, artist Lee Shao Hee took photos of black Africans and juxtaposed them against animals, but the idea was not so much to insult as it was to educate. According to Lee,
“In many ways we are all like animals and I just wanted to demonstrate just how close we are to our animal past.”
The research by both Freisburg in Germany and Argyle in the United Kingdom have not been without their detractors and critics, but it would provide a reasonable explanation of why Africa continues to remain in its current quagmire. According to Argyle,
“We’re not being racist. If each and every time we bring up the argument to be reasonable, we get shut down for being ‘racist’, we’re never going to see any progress or development in this area and Africa will always remain poor.”
“At some point in time we all have to acknowledge that the science is undeniable and from there maybe we can find some workable long term solutions.”
Even here in the United States, the richest country in the world, blacks are over represented in terms of poverty. According to research by the Kaiser Foundation, on average the rate of poverty in blacks is 1 out of every 5, outside of the U.S., where arguably blacks have the best opportunity for social mobility, the numbers are far higher, with almost 9 in 10 blacks outside of the U.S. in poverty.
Until political correctness catches up with science, these numbers are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future.